Energetic Forum  

Go Back   Energetic Forum > Energetic Forum Discussion > Renewable Energy
Welcome, lamare.
You last visited: Today at 05:52 AM
Private Messages: Unread 0, Total 27.
Homepage Energetic Science Ministries User CP FAQ Calendar Search New Posts Mark Forums Read Open Buddy List Log Out

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 7 votes, 4.86 average.
  #661 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 06:22 AM
JohnStone's Avatar
JohnStone JohnStone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by torpex View Post
...
Then turn off the circuit.
Then turn on the circuit without touching anything, in my circuit the bulb lights like before.

This is normal behavior?
...
I imagine the behaviour like a flywheel. It takes time to accelerate it but it will turn a while after that. You need to apply the force adapted to the increasing turn speed. Such behaviour is told to be true at caps if you charge them with cold energy. Batteries the same (Bedini). So why not at coils as well?
Play with different on and off times if you like to find out at what time the flywheel slows down. This time might be dependent on the max. magnetic strength in your coil (= turn speed of the flywheel).
__________________
Experts spend hours a day in order to question their doing while others stopped thinking feeling they were professionals.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #662 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 08:05 AM
ZeropointEnergy's Avatar
ZeropointEnergy ZeropointEnergy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 121
MOSFET's

Quote:
Originally Posted by larryross View Post
Hi all you good people.
Thanks for the tips and well wishes. Truly this world is full of good people... wars are between governments and people have to pay the price.
I found what I think will be a good sub for the nte mosfet. Check out the
2SK2837 by Toshiba.

500V
20A continues, 80A pulse
RDsOn 0.21
Fast switching
Repetitive Avalanche Rated

I just bought 10 off E-bay for US$1.28 each with free shipping. If these work out it will be good for the project.

I ran across something that is interesting to me. Any one heard of Colloidal Silver? Sounds like something I want to try.

Regards All
Larry

Hey All,

Found another MOSFET close to NTE or better.

IRFP460, N-Channel.
500V, 0.27 Ohm, 20A and 80A pulsed

This is what I'm going to use in place of the NTE2397 and wil hopefully end up in powering a large motor, sound good Larry

http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/data...ld/IRFP460.pdf

Regards
Zero

Last edited by ZeropointEnergy : Yesterday at 08:08 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #663 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 09:30 AM
iankoglin iankoglin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 51
Is a movistor important

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ufopolitics View Post
Hello Iankoglin,

Thanks for your kind words, you have no idea how they rejoice my soul...
Must of times we do not realize how valuable our words as an expression of our feelings could be...but I do perceive them clearly when they come full of joy and positive feelings...

You will be able to build that motor for your vehicle very soon, and more...
The circuit with the timer 555 is pretty good, I have driven big motors with it...is a simple system to start playing with.

To a certain point it is good not to be an EE, during all the career you learn all possibilities not to obtain results that violate certain laws, that fact becomes a barrier to understand anything that brakes those rules...it ends up blinding and narrowing your points of view, unless you were the type who always wanted to go beyond whatever they thought you, and argued with your professors to exhaustion about other methods and possibilities...

I wish you the bests of luck in your project, and We all will be here to help you in case there would be any problems in the way to the light. You have great guys there, Bob and Dana...to guide you through this.

Warm Regards Kogs!!

Ufopolitics
G'Day UFO
I have nearly finished building the Circuit BUT one question I have
I imagine the Movistor should be a 12v clamping device I can not seem to get one any where the only thing I can get near is a Metal Oxide varistor and it is a 38v
Do you have a part number for this Item?
Kindest regards Kogs
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #664 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 09:38 AM
torpex's Avatar
torpex torpex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 58
Hi all,
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnStone View Post
I imagine the behaviour like a flywheel. It takes time to accelerate it but it will turn a while after that. You need to apply the force adapted to the increasing turn speed. Such behaviour is told to be true at caps if you charge them with cold energy. Batteries the same (Bedini). So why not at coils as well?
Play with different on and off times if you like to find out at what time the flywheel slows down. This time might be dependent on the max. magnetic strength in your coil (= turn speed of the flywheel).
I think I have not explained well.
I do not speak of DTC (t-on,t-off), i speak power off and power on. No inertia, if I turned power off 5 minutes is equal to 1 second.
Ufo says to re-call each time to get radiant, from zero Hz (he uses marks) and work up slowly. In my setup the bulb light always when tunned.

__________________
Regards
http://Cacharreo.com.es/foro
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #665 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 01:14 PM
cinan cinan is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 58
Hallo all,

@larryros

Larry, there is tons of alternative ways how to get better and beat this sucker.
Be positive and look for example here: My Dance With Cancer Talk to the guy,
maybe you'll find inspiration....

@john stone

Dc/Dc converter voltage depends what you are going to do with FODxxx output. I am driving another extra driver TC44xx so my voltage is 5V-5V. If you want to drive MOSFET or IGBT directly, yes, use 5V-15V.

I have in my schematics FODxxx opto isolation jst for practical reason. Wild tests fith coil are executing MOSFETs and short circuit between D-G would fry my controller circuit... When proper hardware will be developed, we can use directly MOSFET driver w/out opto isolation...

@NTE mosfets replacement

I was searching last month for good, cheap MOSFETs and TOSHIBA series TK20xxxx is superb as long as you paralell them to get robust avalanche current. Switching times are also gud. See datasheets for TK20D60U and TK20E60U for example... They are TO220 package. For better current handling you can use TO247 package, just search farnell or digikey....

@torpex
when yo tune circuit to max performance and switch it off and on, yes there will be the same level of voltage on output, immediately....

I still keep in mind Ufo's recommendation about invoking her slowly from low freq.... (I don't know if its really necessary. Ufo can you comment this phenomena ? )

I did tests month ago and find out, that without load you get 600V peaks with only 3-4V input voltage (as UFO also stated before).

Amplitude of those pulses is of course dependent on frequency, as XL of the coil is increasing with frequency. To keep the same amplitude on higher frequencies one needs just to increase input voltage. I was driving coil up 200kHz with same output DC voltage.... If your frequency is too low ( < 300Hz in my case), with input voltage 2V you can get monster pulse far over
MOSFET D-S tolerant voltage... I can't experiment now, as I need MOSFET with higher DS voltage to see what is coming out on low freq. That's why Ufo said, always get load connected !

@Ufo
I have also good idea about little circuit modification to significantly lower 'hot' current consumption. I need to do some tests and I believe, we can improve performance....

cheers,

Cinan
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #666 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 02:15 PM
harishsingh harishsingh is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by cinan View Post
Hallo all,

@larryros

Larry, there is tons of alternative ways how to get better and beat this sucker.
Be positive and look for example here: My Dance With Cancer Talk to the guy,
maybe you'll find inspiration....



cheers,

Cinan
Larry & Cinan. I was surprised it was not mentioned before.

Tullio Simoncini (re)discovered this therapy based on his observations as an onocologist.

Cancer Cure Sodium Bicarbonate 1/3 - YouTube

This video may not last long. Others have disappreared.

Don't want to hijack this discussion. But, dont with todays healthcare system.

Take care,
HS
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #667 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 04:09 PM
tbo_ tbo_ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6
I don't have an EE background so I hope this ain't such a stupid question, but what is the best way or the right way to check the frequency? Right now I'm using my multi-meters frequency tester, grounding the black probe, and when I hook up the red to one leg of the output (after the diode) I get one reading, when I touch the other leg of the output (after the diode) I get a different reading. Same with the duty cycle. Not sure which is the one that's accurate?

Thanks,
Tom
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #668 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 04:33 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 323
Hey Larry...

Quote:
Originally Posted by larryross View Post
Hello UFO
Thanks TBO I was just going over the Beck site.

Looks like I have hijacked your thread... I really didn't intend to. I am very sorry. Should get back to the device and go forward.

Regards
Larry


You could use this thread (and other members also) in order to resolve your problem anytime my friend!

We are all pretty intelligent as to be able to handle both subjects in one thread...and we always keep learning...

Warm regards


Ufopolitics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #669 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 04:41 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 323
Great Tests Bob!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobfrench@fastmail.fm View Post
UFO et al,

I visited a friend of like mindedness and we ran the device on two identical banks of three 12v, 215Ah batteries in series (36v, 215Ah each bank). These are old sulfated marine batteries.

Started with Bank A at 37.16v and Bank B at 36.8v. Ran the charging at 45Hz, 11%DC, 1.3A from 8:36pm until midnight (3.5 hrs). Banks were A= 36.1v, B= 39.8v.

We adjusted the unit to 99.4Hz, 12.8%DC, 450mA and ran until 7:00am.
Bank A= 36.22v, Bank B= 39.7 (the frequency had risen to 101Hz).

Then I adjusted to 144Hz,20%DC, and 1.0A and ran till 9:47am. Bank A= 35.90v, BankB= 40.7v. Stopped and rested the batteries about half an hour (should be an hour, but...).

We swapped the batteries and charged the opposite way (charging Bank A now). The banks had settled some in the rest period (Bank A= 36.6v, Bank B= 38.3v). Under load/charge (144Hz, 11%DC, 1.0A) they started at Bank A= 37.0v, Bank B= 37.2v. An hour later we adjusted to 144Hz, 20%DC, 1.0A and ran until 2:16pm (about 4 hours). Bank A=37.9v, Bank B= 32.35v.

We stopped, rested them for 30 minutes (my bad), swapped then again and started charging Bank B with Bank as the Primary again. 144Hz, 20%DC, 650mA. It seemed odd that the same frequency and DC would draw a lesser amperage, but...). Starting at 2:50pm with Bank A= 37.31v under load, Bank B=33.49v being charged, at 3:27pm Bank A= 36.4v, Bank B= 38.8v, at 4:38pm Bank A= 36.0v, Bank B= 38.8v. We stopped (4:38pm) and rested the batteries until 7:00pm...Bank A= 36.8v, Bank B= 37.8v.

Started with Bank A at 37.16v and Bank B at 36.8v. (= 73.96v combined)
Ended with Bank A= 36.8v, Bank B= 37.8v. (= 74.6v combined)
A slight increase of energy after over 20 hours of running drawing 1 amp much of the time. Batteries are getting conditioned/rejuvenated while powering the device themselves w/o outside input. We can charge back and forth forever and the batteries will just get stronger.

I am going to run at this lower frequency and about 1 amp for a while and see just what it will do with my bigger batteries. At lower frequency the battery has more OFF time to resolve the incoming RE. This may be good while conditioning them. After their plates are remodeled into a crystalline matrix they will take the charge faster and have increased capacity.

That's all for now. Take care and above all have fun!

Bob

Hello Bob,

I am pretty sure we all will make something out of this testings...
Like you said before...it takes a while to crystallize old sulphate batteries...but once they are done then will increase its capacity...

You should let them rest at least an Hour, before re-charge, this time will allow for the plaques and acid to get cool off and settle down, remember hot temp batteries will never take the charge like a cold one...

Did you try to run a brushed motor?
Will like to hear that test...


Warm regards


Ufopolitics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #670 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 04:45 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 323
Hey Torpex...

Quote:
Originally Posted by torpex View Post
Hi all,

Ufo and all that has worked,

Behavior of my circuit:
When Freq and DTC are set the bulb lights up.
Then turn off the circuit.
Then turn on the circuit without touching anything, in my circuit the bulb lights like before.

This is normal behavior?

I think that does not correspond with the description of Ufo to invoke Radiant.



Torpex,

Your explanation is not complete...please be slow and explain every detail..like:

Quote:
Behavior of my circuit:
When Freq and DTC are set the bulb lights up.
Then turn off the circuit.
Ok, Turn off the circuit, BUT, Did you lower frequency BACK TO ZERO before Turn Off??
You did not explained that important point there...so we do not know...
If you turn off and LEFT Frequency at HIGH LEVELS, of course it is expected that at Turn On it will "JUMP" to High Output...

So please clarify that...


Regards


Ufopolitics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #671 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 04:51 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 323
Hi Tbo

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbo_ View Post
I don't have an EE background so I hope this ain't such a stupid question, but what is the best way or the right way to check the frequency? Right now I'm using my multi-meters frequency tester, grounding the black probe, and when I hook up the red to one leg of the output (after the diode) I get one reading, when I touch the other leg of the output (after the diode) I get a different reading. Same with the duty cycle. Not sure which is the one that's accurate?

Thanks,
Tom
Hey Tom,


The way I measure Frequency is like you do with Meters, the Scope also...
BUT, I connect both probes of meter to Pos-Neg of Input-Output, positive with positive and negative with negative.
You can not use the same ground reference for both, since Radiant creates a Ground (Negative) where Positive of Hot is...so you will read Hot Freq well but not Radiant with Negative ground from batteries...

Hope it explained well...


Regards


Ufopolitics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #672 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 04:54 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 323
Movistor...

Quote:
Originally Posted by iankoglin View Post
G'Day UFO
I have nearly finished building the Circuit BUT one question I have
I imagine the Movistor should be a 12v clamping device I can not seem to get one any where the only thing I can get near is a Metal Oxide varistor and it is a 38v
Do you have a part number for this Item?
Kindest regards Kogs
Hello Kogs,

The Movistor is there to protect the Low voltage circuit (like a resettable fuse), it will run without it...
However I will check later part number in NTE and get back to you...

Regards


Ufopolitics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #673 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 05:11 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 323
Hey Cinan,

Quote:
Originally Posted by cinan View Post
Hallo all,

@larryros

Larry, there is tons of alternative ways how to get better and beat this sucker.
Be positive and look for example here: My Dance With Cancer Talk to the guy,
maybe you'll find inspiration....

@john stone

Dc/Dc converter voltage depends what you are going to do with FODxxx output. I am driving another extra driver TC44xx so my voltage is 5V-5V. If you want to drive MOSFET or IGBT directly, yes, use 5V-15V.

I have in my schematics FODxxx opto isolation jst for practical reason. Wild tests fith coil are executing MOSFETs and short circuit between D-G would fry my controller circuit... When proper hardware will be developed, we can use directly MOSFET driver w/out opto isolation...

@NTE mosfets replacement

I was searching last month for good, cheap MOSFETs and TOSHIBA series TK20xxxx is superb as long as you paralell them to get robust avalanche current. Switching times are also gud. See datasheets for TK20D60U and TK20E60U for example... They are TO220 package. For better current handling you can use TO247 package, just search farnell or digikey....

@torpex
when yo tune circuit to max performance and switch it off and on, yes there will be the same level of voltage on output, immediately....

I still keep in mind Ufo's recommendation about invoking her slowly from low freq.... (I don't know if its really necessary. Ufo can you comment this phenomena ? )

I did tests month ago and find out, that without load you get 600V peaks with only 3-4V input voltage (as UFO also stated before).

Amplitude of those pulses is of course dependent on frequency, as XL of the coil is increasing with frequency. To keep the same amplitude on higher frequencies one needs just to increase input voltage. I was driving coil up 200kHz with same output DC voltage.... If your frequency is too low ( < 300Hz in my case), with input voltage 2V you can get monster pulse far over
MOSFET D-S tolerant voltage... I can't experiment now, as I need MOSFET with higher DS voltage to see what is coming out on low freq. That's why Ufo said, always get load connected !

@Ufo
I have also good idea about little circuit modification to significantly lower 'hot' current consumption. I need to do some tests and I believe, we can improve performance....

cheers,

Cinan


Hey Cinan,

That's great that you will be developing a very small circuit to create Hot and invoke Radiant!!!...great news...we need that for my motors!!

Run a Motor with a 9Volt (or a small LiPo pack) battery and turn a huge generator is my goal...

Now related to:

Quote:
I still keep in mind Ufo's recommendation about invoking her slowly from low freq.... (I don't know if its really necessary. Ufo can you comment this phenomena ? )
Remember we are all experimenting here...leaving the frequency at higher rates and changing loads could bring "undesired results"....
I always TURN OFF TO ZERO Frequency BEFORE TURN OFF the whole Unit.
Reason: The system tends to "Jump" when you leave Frequency High.
The System will adjust "Gradually" with My tuning while I observe Voltage Meters...and Load performence.

In a future we could design an "Automatic Frequency Adjustment Circuit" (like a "Cruise Control) according to "Load Demand"...but for now...I drive it "Manually"...


Quote:
I did tests month ago and find out, that without load you get 600V peaks with only 3-4V input voltage (as UFO also stated before).
Running the system without a load at Radiant Output will give you completely false readings at output, besides, Radiant will definitively Retro-Feedback into your circuit through Input (before diodes) and could blow your Mosfet's and other components. So, there must be at least a Load Resistor at Output at all times...but remember that Radiant goes through resistance without any effort, so the resistor must be set according to RE tolerance...meaning, a very low resistor of lower Kilo ohms, would do absolutely nothing, Nada.

@Larry: Great find on the Mosfet's and very cheap, yes we need that!!

There are many out there, and it is better to use the KISS approach by now to drive mosfet's simple, without Drivers...later we will get "Sophisticated" on this issue...I will love to get there very soon, but let's try to keep the controller as simple as possible so others could replicate them easier and cheaper.

Thanks all for your comments!!


Warm regards


Ufopolitics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #674 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 05:34 PM
tbo_ tbo_ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ufopolitics View Post
Hey Tom,


The way I measure Frequency is like you do with Meters, the Scope also...
BUT, I connect both probes of meter to Pos-Neg of Input-Output, positive with positive and negative with negative.
You can not use the same ground reference for both, since Radiant creates a Ground (Negative) where Positive of Hot is...so you will read Hot Freq well but not Radiant with Negative ground from batteries...

Hope it explained well...


Regards


Ufopolitics
Thanks UFO, perfect.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #675 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 05:42 PM
torpex's Avatar
torpex torpex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 58
HI @Ufo,
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ufopolitics View Post
Ok, Turn off the circuit, BUT, Did you lower frequency BACK TO ZERO before Turn Off??
No, (without touching anything).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ufopolitics View Post
If you turn off and LEFT Frequency at HIGH LEVELS, of course it is expected that at Turn On it will "JUMP" to High Output...
This was the question. So I understand that the Radiant is set for the load and is invoked again, working the cold side ok. Or, obviusly, only hot side at high output?

This is just to ask about the behavior. Normally I always put the pots to zero when disconnected.

Thanks for your reply.

__________________
Regards
http://Cacharreo.com.es/foro
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #676 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 05:47 PM
torpex's Avatar
torpex torpex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by cinan View Post
@torpex
when yo tune circuit to max performance and switch it off and on, yes there will be the same level of voltage on output, immediately....

I still keep in mind Ufo's recommendation about invoking her slowly from low freq.... (I don't know if its really necessary. Ufo can you comment this phenomena ? )
Hi @cinan, thanks for your reply.

Have you calculated performance in their tests?

__________________
Regards
http://Cacharreo.com.es/foro
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #677 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 06:04 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 323
Hey Torpex...

Quote:
Originally Posted by torpex View Post
HI @Ufo,

No, (without touching anything).


This was the question. So I understand that the Radiant is set for the load and is invoked again, working the cold side ok. Or, obviusly, only hot side at high output?

This is just to ask about the behavior. Normally I always put the pots to zero when disconnected.

Thanks for your reply.


Hey Torpex,

Ok, so it is normal...if you leave Frequency at High, and turn Off your oscillator...then turn On again (Without Replacing to a different Load!)...of course you will get Hot-Cold at same rates you had before.
BOTH Currents will develop at High Frequency Turn On, Hot-Cold.

I, particularly Do Not like to do it like that...

To me is like starting a Gas Engine in your Car, with your feet stepped on accelerator full blast to max...and engine cold...you could do MANY things wrong in your Gas engine that way, like bending a valve, cracking a Head, blowing your timing chain, bending a Piston Rod, etc,etc... among many more unpredicted results...all negative and bad.

Put yourself in both currents flow, the diodes and mosfet's...and think...

Now, if, the system have an specific "absorber" or instant regulator response circuit to be able to handle the High Traffic Network all the sudden...then it is different, it will work smooth.

That is my opinion, it may differ from others...but I hate blowing components or getting things on fire...if I could've prevent it.


Regards


Ufopolitics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #678 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 06:11 PM
kEhYo77's Avatar
kEhYo77 kEhYo77 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 29
Hi.
I've just finished soldering and setting things up.

My setup includes:
- Frequency Generator based on 555 and LM393 with
(independent pulse width, 5V TTL output, 9V battery powered)
it is the flat box with pots
- High side - Low side driven N-MOSFET/IGBT switch
capable of switching up to 500V impulses at 20A 20 ns rise/fall time
based on IR2110 driver switching two IRFP460 n-channel mosfets

Some testing should follow soon...
Attached Thumbnails
my-motors-got-me-tap-into-radiant-energy-setup.jpg  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #679 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 06:23 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 323
Wow!!...Nice Set-Up!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by kEhYo77 View Post
Hi.
I've just finished soldering and setting things up.

My setup includes:
- Frequency Generator based on 555 and LM393 with
(independent pulse width, 5V TTL output, 9V battery powered)
it is the flat box with pots
- High side - Low side driven N-MOSFET/IGBT switch
capable of switching up to 500V impulses at 20A 20 ns rise/fall time
based on IR2110 driver switching two IRFP460 n-channel mosfets

Some testing should follow soon...

Hello kEhYo77,

That is a nice set-up there!!

Nice Coil, nice and robust Fet's!...it should drive beautiful!
That's great you have a way to know which will do better, LM339 or 555 Timer!!
Waiting to see results!!

Regards

Ufopolitics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #680 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 07:22 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbo_ View Post
Thanks UFO, perfect.
Ok, I missed something:

If measuring with a Scope DO NOT USE BOTH (Ground and Probe) in either one!!
It could burn your Scope!
So in Scope just use the Positive Probe on Input-Output, and make sure you attenuate at least 1000X...

Regards

Ufopolitics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #681 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 07:35 PM
larryross's Avatar
larryross larryross is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: In my shop
Posts: 19
Send a message via Skype™ to larryross
Hi Zero
I only see one thing wrong with the IRF460 which I also considered this one, but it is only rated single avalanche and not repetitive. I am not sure how much difference that will make, but I do remember UFO saying earlier in the thread that it should be repetitive rated. Also I choose mine for the cheep price ($1.28 US) because of finance and the potential of loosing several while experimenting. I know this isn't the best criteria to make a choice on, but we will see if it will work well for me.

Hi Cinan and Torpex
Cinan Thanks for the link.

Also when we can determine the correct process of invoking radiant then a pic bases oscillatory circuit could be programmed to always invoke her every time automatically.

Hi harishsingh
Thanks for the link.
I have heard about the baking soda cure. I did the molasses baking soda for 4 months before I started chemo with no good results and it tasted terrible. I do believe that if the bicarbonate of soda could be injected in to the tumor it would be a very effective way to get it where it needs to be, but there is no one willing to do this and it would be difficult to do on deep tumors.


Thnaks everyone
Regards
Larry


Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeropointEnergy View Post
Hey All,

Found another MOSFET close to NTE or better.

IRFP460, N-Channel.
500V, 0.27 Ohm, 20A and 80A pulsed

This is what I'm going to use in place of the NTE2397 and wil hopefully end up in powering a large motor, sound good Larry

http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/data...ld/IRFP460.pdf

Regards
Zero
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #682 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 07:43 PM
kEhYo77's Avatar
kEhYo77 kEhYo77 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 29
Variable pulse width frequency generator with high-low side N-MOSFET switch TEST

Somebody posted before similar circuit (UfoDouble.pdf) but it didn't work for me. The bootstrap capacitor wasn't charging. It needed two more transistors according to the application note for this to work, here is a pic:
Attached Thumbnails
my-motors-got-me-tap-into-radiant-energy-ir2110.jpg  

Last edited by kEhYo77 : Yesterday at 07:58 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #683 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 08:37 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 323
Hello Larry

Quote:
Originally Posted by larryross View Post
Hi Zero
I only see one thing wrong with the IRF460 which I also considered this one, but it is only rated single avalanche and not repetitive. I am not sure how much difference that will make, but I do remember UFO saying earlier in the thread that it should be repetitive rated. Also I choose mine for the cheep price ($1.28 US) because of finance and the potential of loosing several while experimenting. I know this isn't the best criteria to make a choice on, but we will see if it will work well for me.

Hi Cinan and Torpex
Cinan Thanks for the link.

Also when we can determine the correct process of invoking radiant then a pic bases oscillatory circuit could be programmed to always invoke her every time automatically.

Hi harishsingh
Thanks for the link.
I have heard about the baking soda cure. I did the molasses baking soda for 4 months before I started chemo with no good results and it tasted terrible. I do believe that if the bicarbonate of soda could be injected in to the tumor it would be a very effective way to get it where it needs to be, but there is no one willing to do this and it would be difficult to do on deep tumors.


Thnaks everyone
Regards
Larry

Hello Larry,

The NTE2397 is Avalanche rated, however, it handles only 40A Pulsed...Yours handles 80A Pulsed, so, that doubling of amperage flow at pulsed, I think compensates for the "Non Avalanche Ratings"...What I would do Larry (I do not know how many you've got), but I will put in parallel at least five or six of them...

Regarding the Cancer Cure...

There is a Tree that grows only in the Amazons Forest...there is a name of it in English, however that name confuses with other similar resin...
In pure Spanish is called Sangre de Grado , in English is called Dragon's Blood...or something like. It is a dark red fluid, and the one imported here are only a low percentage...the best way is to get it directly from the Natives of South America (Perú, Brasil, Ecuador) right from the tree...
The doses are 10-15 drops in Fruit Juice...every morning before breakfast.
It is a very high healer for bleeding and Ulcers and polyps healing-disappearing...I cure a friend of mine with that product...He was going to have surgery of removal of a piece of Colon...never needed after...Doctor could not believe after making a Scan...

The second treatment should be "Uña de Gato" (Cat´s Claw)...but that is a longer time acting deal...the one I mention before is a faster one (One Week) break another week and it's over...
The best fruit to use as a juice to dissolve the drops is Papaya.

In Thrives site Health, there are also great comments about other alternatives cures, like Vitamin B-17...among others.

My Mom and Dad died both of Cancer, They were both treated with Radio-Therapy...and all they did was fried their Brains-Lungs...and reduce their lifetime...so I do NOT recommend Chemo Nor Radio Therapies at all..no matter what Doctors say.

Dr Rife frequency list have the numbers, but the application is where it comes to very expensive equipment...Oscillators we could build ourselves, and maybe better than the ones from China...But, making the Copper Rings that you get your body within (Like a Huge Coil)...and are adjustable...that is where the complications comes as spec's and travel ratio of this rings that are the Frequency Transmitters and move through our body area to be treated...

Unfortunately, the cures of Cancer and others have become a "Business as Usual" and very profitable market for the "White Mafia"...


Regards



Ufopolitics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #684 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 08:54 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 323
Matching MOSFET'S

Quote:
Originally Posted by larryross View Post
Hi all you good people.
Thanks for the tips and well wishes. Truly this world is full of good people... wars are between governments and people have to pay the price.
I found what I think will be a good sub for the nte mosfet. Check out the
2SK2837 by Toshiba.

500V
20A continues, 80A pulse
RDsOn 0.21
Fast switching
Repetitive Avalanche Rated

I just bought 10 off E-bay for US$1.28 each with free shipping. If these work out it will be good for the project.

I ran across something that is interesting to me. Any one heard of Colloidal Silver? Sounds like something I want to try.

Regards All
Larry

Hey Larry,

This Mosfet IS Avalanche rated...I cross referenced with NTE and it gives me NTE2970...is a big Case than TO220...
I believe I have those also, but never test them for this system...the only thing I see is that their driving Gate voltage is higher (-+30V)...so I do not know is the low signal from directly the LM339 or 555 will make them move, unless a Dariver is connected between...but other than that, they are great transistors...88A Pulsed and faster RdsOn=0.25 versus 0.55 Ohms of the 2397...

So, except for the driving voltage they need I see them great!


Regards


Ufopolitics
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #685 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Yesterday, 11:56 PM
IndianaBoys IndianaBoys is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by larryross View Post
Hi UFO
Thanks for your kind response. Sorry if I seem impatient, but I have cancer so I don't know how much longer I have on this earth. I am cramming as much knowledge about the alternative energy subject that I can. Looking for something I can build. I would like to leave something behind that my family can use to make their lives easier. Meds and all it takes to keep me alive is eating up our budget so I don't have a lot of money to experimenting (as much as I love it). Please bare with me if I seem anxious at times. Again sorry.

Regards
Larry

Larry, no problem.

Get yourself a Zapper and live to a ripe old age:

How I was Healed of Cancer

Best Zapper | Integrated Wellness System (Zapper + Zappicator)

IndianaBoys

UPDATED - did not see your reply that you have built zappers before. Look at building a zappicator that will plug into your zapper:

Zapper FAQ Building a Hulda Clark Zapper

It should not be necessary to run the specific frequency for colon cancer. The zapper/zappicator should catch it.

Found this obscure post: Dr. Clark says a low frequency (1 kHz) zapper is more effective with a
zappicator than a 30 kHz unit. When I asked her about using our Auto-Zap
at 2.5 kHz, she said it would work very well.

It seems to me that you would want to build a zapper at 2.5 khz and also build a zappicator that plugs into the zapper. The zappicator is a speaker that allows the frequencies to penetrate deeper in bone, colon, organs, etc.

You would also want to build a 30 Khz zapper and zap for longer durations (many hours in a row).

I referenced BestZappers.com as they seem to have a real good handle on the device they developed with the many years of collaboration with Dr. Clark.

Also get the Cure For All Diseases or Cure For All Cancers book and follow the protocols. Zapping alone is not the solution. It will also take some cleansing and rebuilding.

Last edited by IndianaBoys : Today at 12:13 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #686 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Today, 01:09 AM
bobfrench@fastmail.fm bobfrench@fastmail.fm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 35
25k2837?

UFO,

Today I tried to run a brushed motor (drill motor) and it did turn, though slowly. I was hesitant to turn up the amps and I need to reduce a cap to get higher frequency (mine was 150-200 maybe). My MOSFETs got up around 190 and so I shut it down. I'm going to build a fan into things also. But it does run. I was not able to compare heat. Sorry. I will have to pursue rhis though.

By your description of where you take your frequency measurements, is that basically across the primary battery(for input frequency) and accross the output leads for the other? Am I understanding that right?

Also today I charged some 36v, 16Ah batteries from 34.66v to 36.60v (measured after an hour or more rest) at 142Hz, 6.5%DC, 100mA. I may have been able to do this in a couple of hours as the charge bat was up to 37.1v within 30 minutes, but I let it run all day while I went to work. I think the low power setting can't lift the charge any higher, so it stalls. At the end it was at 37.1v right where it was when I left for work. But this does encourage me that at some point we might be charging batteries at very minimal costs.

Larry,

Where did you get the 25K2837 MOSFETs online?did I miss that info somewhere? I will gladly test these out...they sound great. Thanks.

Bob
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #687 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Today, 04:48 AM
larryross's Avatar
larryross larryross is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: In my shop
Posts: 19
Send a message via Skype™ to larryross
Hi IndianaBoys
Thanks for the information.
It was the Hulda Clark zapper that I replicated. I layed it out and had 50 pc boards made. I could easily modify one to variable and bring it to any frequency I want, but why did you suggest 2.5Khz. I guess I missed the part in your post about the obscure post that Clark made. Where was that post? I have a vacuum bulb like rife used he did it wirelessly (I don't think he could figure out how to strap an electrode on a cancer cell ), but I don't know what voltage level it would take to get the zapper to power the bulb to transmit the signal. I could figure it out if I could just find the bulb.

Got to go for now
Later
Larry


Quote:
Originally Posted by IndianaBoys View Post
Larry, no problem.

Get yourself a Zapper and live to a ripe old age:

How I was Healed of Cancer

Best Zapper | Integrated Wellness System (Zapper + Zappicator)

IndianaBoys

UPDATED - did not see your reply that you have built zappers before. Look at building a zappicator that will plug into your zapper:

Zapper FAQ Building a Hulda Clark Zapper

It should not be necessary to run the specific frequency for colon cancer. The zapper/zappicator should catch it.

Found this obscure post: Dr. Clark says a low frequency (1 kHz) zapper is more effective with a
zappicator than a 30 kHz unit. When I asked her about using our Auto-Zap
at 2.5 kHz, she said it would work very well.

It seems to me that you would want to build a zapper at 2.5 khz and also build a zappicator that plugs into the zapper. The zappicator is a speaker that allows the frequencies to penetrate deeper in bone, colon, organs, etc.

You would also want to build a 30 Khz zapper and zap for longer durations (many hours in a row).

I referenced BestZappers.com as they seem to have a real good handle on the device they developed with the many years of collaboration with Dr. Clark.

Also get the Cure For All Diseases or Cure For All Cancers book and follow the protocols. Zapping alone is not the solution. It will also take some cleansing and rebuilding.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #688 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Today, 06:21 AM
torpex's Avatar
torpex torpex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ufopolitics View Post
Hey Torpex,

Ok, so it is normal...if you leave Frequency at High, and turn Off your oscillator...then turn On again (Without Replacing to a different Load!)...of course you will get Hot-Cold at same rates you had before.
BOTH Currents will develop at High Frequency Turn On, Hot-Cold.

I, particularly Do Not like to do it like that...

To me is like starting a Gas Engine in your Car, with your feet stepped on accelerator full blast to max...and engine cold...you could do MANY things wrong in your Gas engine that way, like bending a valve, cracking a Head, blowing your timing chain, bending a Piston Rod, etc,etc... among many more unpredicted results...all negative and bad.

Put yourself in both currents flow, the diodes and mosfet's...and think...

Now, if, the system have an specific "absorber" or instant regulator response circuit to be able to handle the High Traffic Network all the sudden...then it is different, it will work smooth.

That is my opinion, it may differ from others...but I hate blowing components or getting things on fire...if I could've prevent it.


Regards


Ufopolitics
Hi @Ufo,
Ok, is understood. Very grateful for the clarification.
It was very important for me to understand the process and maybe help someone else.

__________________
Regards
http://Cacharreo.com.es/foro
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #689 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Today, 06:32 AM
wings wings is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndianaBoys View Post
Larry, no problem.

Get yourself a Zapper and live to a ripe old age:

How I was Healed of Cancer

Best Zapper | Integrated Wellness System (Zapper + Zappicator)

IndianaBoys

UPDATED - did not see your reply that you have built zappers before. Look at building a zappicator that will plug into your zapper:

Zapper FAQ Building a Hulda Clark Zapper

It should not be necessary to run the specific frequency for colon cancer. The zapper/zappicator should catch it.

Found this obscure post: Dr. Clark says a low frequency (1 kHz) zapper is more effective with a
zappicator than a 30 kHz unit. When I asked her about using our Auto-Zap
at 2.5 kHz, she said it would work very well.

It seems to me that you would want to build a zapper at 2.5 khz and also build a zappicator that plugs into the zapper. The zappicator is a speaker that allows the frequencies to penetrate deeper in bone, colon, organs, etc.

You would also want to build a 30 Khz zapper and zap for longer durations (many hours in a row).

I referenced BestZappers.com as they seem to have a real good handle on the device they developed with the many years of collaboration with Dr. Clark.

Also get the Cure For All Diseases or Cure For All Cancers book and follow the protocols. Zapping alone is not the solution. It will also take some cleansing and rebuilding.
more recent products - impulse that reset the body cells information - the recovery of the information is provided by near cells

SCENAR
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
  #690 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old Today, 06:43 AM
torpex's Avatar
torpex torpex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by kEhYo77 View Post
Hi.
I've just finished soldering and setting things up.

My setup includes:
- Frequency Generator based on 555 and LM393 with
(independent pulse width, 5V TTL output, 9V battery powered)
it is the flat box with pots
- High side - Low side driven N-MOSFET/IGBT switch
capable of switching up to 500V impulses at 20A 20 ns rise/fall time
based on IR2110 driver switching two IRFP460 n-channel mosfets

Some testing should follow soon...
Hi @kEhYo77,
A very good setup.
You use the outputs 6 and 2 (555) to OP+ (LM393)?

In your video:
What type of bulb you are using?
I see the caps around coil, you're use them in this setup?


__________________
Regards
http://Cacharreo.com.es/foro
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Options


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 8 (4 members and 4 guests)
lamare, cinan, hdtbiz, prochiro
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
2007 Copyright ? Energetic Forum? A Non Profit Corporation - All Rights Reserved